Lubomyr Luciuk, Kingston, ON.
We always suspected it. We tried to tell reporters, politicians, RCMP investigators, even a few of those ranged against us in the public arena, about what we were certain was true – but they wouldn’t believe us. I can’t blame them. There was no hard proof, not in the 1980s, to confirm Soviet agents of influence had initiated “active measures” to undermine the anti-Communist Ukrainian community in the West.
Now there is. Code-named Operation Payback, this plan was cynically orchestrated to exploit the understandable desire of the Jewish diaspora to see perpetrators of some of the greatest atrocities of the 20th century – the Nazis – brought to justice. By the late 1960s, quite alarmingly from a Soviet point-of-view, Jewish and Ukrainian émigrés had begun to rally together in defence of human rights activists and dissidents in the USSR. By propagating stories about “thousands” of Nazis supposedly hiding within North America’s Ukrainian and Baltic communities Moscow’s men deliberately and effectively fragmented this common front.
These KGB covert operations were outlined candidly in a now-declassified memorandum analyzed by Professor Olga Bertelsen and published in 2020 in the respected International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence.
On 18 October 1985 Stepan Mukha, head of Soviet Ukraine’s Committee of State Security, addressed Volodymyr Scherbytsky, First Secretary of the Communist Party of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. Following consultations with his Russian KGB counterparts, Comrade Mukha wrote, his operatives so effectively deployed their “operational capabilities” that Washington was “compelled” to create an Office of Special Investigations within the Department of Justice, in 1979. To further shape general opinion polemical tracts denigrating the Ukrainian nationalist movement were circulated widely, including the American Communist Party leader Michael Hanusiak’s, Lest We Forget. It was reissued twice. Even I got a copy.
“Considering the positive evolution” of Operation Payback in America, measures “aimed at unfolding a similar campaign in Canada were implemented” in 1980-1985. Materials about the alleged wartime criminality of the ‘Galicia Division’ were “planted” in The Toronto Star with the resulting outrage stoked until, this spymaster claimed, Ottawa was “forced” to establish the Commission of Inquiry on War Criminals, headed by Mr. Justice Jules Deschênes, in February 1985. All this skullduggery obliged the Ukrainian Canadian community to “divert efforts and funds” to its own defence, weakening its capacity for otherwise challenging Soviet narratives and behaviour. I know this is true. I was there.
How many stories were planted? The Deschênes Commission’s final report listed several dozen articles about “Nazi war criminals in Canada.” For example, Irwin Cotler, as reported in the Ottawa Citizen, 13 July 1981, said ‘at least 100’ Nazis were amongst us, a number he inflated to ‘maybe 1,000’ for La Presse on 13 April 1983. In the pages of the Toronto Star, 18 June 1982, David Matas gave a figure of 50-60, outdone by Sol Littman, the Canadian representative of the Los Angeles-based ‘Simon Wiesenthal Center,’ who touted the figure of 3,000 on 8 November 1984, repeating this for the Toronto Star on 25 January 1985. After reviewing all these claims Justice Deschênes observed: “Outside interveners concerning alleged war criminals residing in Canada have spread increasingly large and grossly exaggerated figures as to their estimated number.”
After also carefully studying the wartime history of the ‘Galicia Division,’ the Commission concluded it should not be indicted as a group; that members of the Division were individually screened for security purposes before admission to Canada; that charges of war crimes against members of the Division had never been substantiated, either in 1950 when they were first preferred, or in 1984 when they were renewed, or before the Commission, and that, in the absence of participation in, or knowledge of specific war crimes, mere membership in the ‘Galicia Division’ was insufficient to justify prosecution. Finally, the Commission noted no case could be made against members of the Division for revocation of citizenship or deportation since the Canadian authorities were fully aware of the relevant facts in 1950 and admission to Canada was not granted because of any false representation, or fraud, or concealment of material circumstances.
Despite these rather definitive findings, allegations about the ‘Galicia Division’ have sporadically been resuscitated. In October 2017, Kiril Kalinin, operating out of the Russian embassy in Ottawa, even circulated mendacious tales about the family history of Chrystia Freeland, then Canada’s Minister for Foreign Affairs, while tweeting provocative statements about imagined ‘Nazi war memorials’ in Canada. After his subterfuges were exposed Kalinin was declared persona non grata and expelled.
Tellingly, the annual report of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians identifies the Russian Federation as a “primary threat actor” conducting foreign interference activities in Canada. Yet there are journalists who studiously ignore this geopolitical reality, not to mention the findings of the Deschênes Commission, preferring to re-spew the concocted, hateful, and divisive fables Mukha and his minions spread, starting decades ago. Distracting attention from Russia’s ongoing war against Ukraine and the fascistic agenda of the KGB man in the Kremlin seem to be the goals of the current disinformation campaign. One hopes Canada’s security and intelligence services will help counter those who seek to riven what remains of the Free World.
Hooligans scuttle about in the dark and destroy private property. Their ilk, who desecrate cemetery monuments or spray-paint community memorials, are best left for the police to round up. As for anyone who turns a blind eye to criminal vandalism, or tries to justify a hate crime, I recommend the words of the evangelist (Matthew 7:5) – “You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.”
Lubomyr Luciuk is a professor of political geography at the Royal Military College of Canada
Share on Social Media
